AAW Neutron vs KOMAKI Flora

Compare Specifications of Neutron and Flora

Selected Scooters

AAW Neutron
AAW Neutron

Brand:

Model:

KOMAKI Flora
KOMAKI Flora

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor High Quality BLDC,Water Proof Interior Permanent Magnet, Brushless Motor 3000 WATT Hub Motor
Range 65-130 km/charge 80-100 km
Charging Time 3-4 hours 4 to 5 hour
Load Carrying Capacity 150 kg --
Top Speed 30 kmph --
Riding Modes -- Eco, Sport & Turbo
Battery 60volt Lithim-Phosphet
Battery Cycle : 2500
Battery Life : 6-7 Years
Detachable LIPO4 battery
Charger 60V 8A/6A Micro charger with auto cut Portable charger
Controller -- 38 Amp controller
Battery Warranty 3years --
Display -- Vivid smart dash
Gear 3 Speed with Reverse motion --
Headlamp LED with DRL(Day running Light) LED with DRL
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Appolo Tubless Tyre 90/100/10 --
Rear Appolo Tubless Tyre 90/100/10 --
Wheel / RIM Stylish Aluminium Alloy Wheel --
Brakes
Front Disc Disc brake 270X35mm
Rear Drum Drum
Suspension
Front Hydraulic Double Telescopic --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Garnet Red
Sacramento Green
Jet Black
Steel Grey


Physical Specs
Length 1760 mm --
Width 745 mm --
Height 950 mm --
Overview
About The AAW Neutron is an innovative, feature-packed electric scooter that is perfect for those who Read More The Komaki Flora Electric Scooter is an impressive entry in the eco-friendly transportation seg Read More
Features - ICAT/ARAI Approved
- Digital Speedometer
- Digital Charger
- Paking Switch
- Keyless Entry
- Anti-skid technology
- Long comfortable seat
- Additional backrest
- Dual footrest
- Flat footboard
- 18 L boot space
- Sound system with bluetooth connectivity radio fm
- Keyfob keyless entry and control
- Parking assist /cruise control
- Reverse assist
- Sos (emergency) button
- Wirelessly updatable feature

Komaki Flora

Komaki Flora

Komaki Flora

Komaki Flora
Additional Details Controller Shocket System : 12 Tubes High Quality --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3884